Post by Admin on Dec 11, 2017 17:38:46 GMT
Hi everyone. I'm preparing to do some Peer Review of your models. We're considering doing transparent reviews that allow interaction with modelers/theorists.
I'm listing below what I'd like to have for each model in order to consider the model as possibly having high plausibility. It may turn out that after requests are fulfilled, I find I need something else in addition.
Review Requests:
FOR ALL MODELS, CNPS REQUESTS:
a. explanation of what caused the fracturing seen in the deep boreholes in Russia & Germany
b. explanation of how sedimentary megasequences formed over millions of years without showing significant erosion between them
c. proof that any radiometric dating is reliable.
Expansion Tectonics: supposes that major Earth features are explained mainly by gradual Earth expansion.
1. Several people have shown that the continents could have fit together on a small Earth with little or no ocean basins.
James Maxlow, David Noel, Gene Ellis et al support expanding/growing Earth models.
_CNPS REQUESTS:
a. a more detailed map of small Earth showing:
a1. where the original continental boundaries fit together
a2. if rock & fossil types match near formerly adjoining boundaries
a3. if trails are left on the seafloors that support the fit
a4. where the continents may have morphed and if there's evidence of such morphing
b. means to distinguish between Earth expansion & Earth morphing (See #5 below).
2. __James Maxlow suggests: the solar wind and/or cosmic rays cause Earth expansion.
www.expansiontectonics.com
_CNPS REQUESTS:
c. an explanation of the solar wind / cosmic rays expansion mechanism and why it's probable
d. a diagram and a calculation of the mechanism.
3. __David Noel suggests: that expansion is due to neutronium in Earth's core that expands at the core surface. (Charles Cagle and Michael Mozina have had similar views.)
www.aoi.com.au/EP/
.An advantage of a neutronium core is that it would not require an outside source for expansion.
.A disadvantage is that it would not increase Earth's mass, so gravity at the surface would weaken instead of strengthen as it expands, whereas the former existence of megafauna suggests that Earth's gravity was effectively weaker in the past.
.Other possible explanations for past weaker gravity for megafauna are a more rapid Earth spin, a much thicker atmosphere & electromagnetic effects.
_CNPS REQUESTS:
c. evidence of neutronium & its expansion
d. an explanation of the neutronium expansion mechanism and why it's probable.
4. __Gene Ellis suggests: that Earth formed from dark matter, that mass & radius of elements increased gradually over time via ionization potential & that the ongoing reduction in Earth's spin rate is a measure of its increasing mass.
ionic-expanding-earth.Weebly.com
_CNPS REQUESTS:
c. evidence of dark matter & of matter expansion via ionization potential
d. an explanation of the dark matter to matter expansion mechanism and why it's probable
e. confirmation that no other means of Earth's spin rate reduction, besides mass increase, such as electromagnetic braking, is probable.
5. __Fred Juenemann theorized that Earth was formerly elongated at the poles (oval-shaped), which would produce the appearance of expansion as it changed to a spherical shape.
www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4932&start=30#p56045
.Advantages of this model are that Earth may have spun faster, countering gravity at the surface for megafauna, and that no neutronium, or input of solar wind or cosmic rays were needed to account for the expansion. Fred also supposed that Earth's formerly thicker atmosphere would have countered gravity.
Electric Universe: supposes that major Earth features are explained mainly by electrical forces.
iascc.org __ holoscience.com __ thunderbolts.info (& Surge Tectonics: ncgt.org __ forums.naturalphilosophy.org/showthread.php?tid=113 )
6. __Bruce Leybourne & __Robert Farrar (& Wal Thornhill) suppose that the Atlantic basin was formed by sustained megalightning, i.e. electric discharge, which also produced fossiliferous sedimentary strata on adjacent continents.
_CNPS REQUESTS:
a. calculations of the precise conditions needed to produce the needed size of arc blasts (or megalightning)
b. specifying which strata & fossils were affected & to what distances, shown on a map
c. an explanation of how sedimentaton occurred
d. a comparison with known lightning trenches & an explanation of why no smaller meandering trench is found on the Atlantic seafloor.
7. __Andy Hall, __Doug Ettinger & maybe Robert (?) suppose that the Colorado plateau and many mountain chains, especially with flat irons, were formed by arc blasts (or megalightning) from the Puerto Rico trench etc.
andrewdhall.wordpress.com/2016/06/05/arc-blast/ __ thedailyplasma.blog/2016/09/16/arc-blast-part-one/
_CNPS REQUESTS:
a. calculations of the precise conditions needed to produce the needed size of megalightning
b. specifying which types of mountains were affected & how
c. cross-sections &/or on-site data.
8. Earth Metamorphism: (__Doug Ettinger) supposes that major Earth features were caused by periodic cataclysmic encounters with a dwarf star system.
EttingerJournals.com
_CNPS REQUESTS:
a. specifying which features were caused by impacts & which by arc blasts (or megalightning)
b. calculations showing sizes & velocities of impactors
c. calculations showing sizes, distances & charges of bodies that produced arc blasts (or megalightning)
d. identification of the dwarf star system on a sky photo map
9. Electrostatic Universe: (__Charles Chandler) supposes that major Earth features were caused by Shock Dynamics & electric double layers within the Earth.
qdl.scs-inc.us/?top=6031
_CNPS REQUESTS:
a. links to relevant papers.
b. brief explanations.
10. Shock Dynamics: (__Mike Fischer) supposes that major Earth features were caused by a very large impactor breaking up the supercontinent.
NewGeology.us
_CNPS REQUESTS:
a. links to relevant papers.
b. brief explanations.
11. Mainstream: (__John Weirich & Doug) supposes that major Earth features were caused by mantle convection.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_tectonics
_CNPS REQUESTS:
a. evidence of mantle convection
b. calculations showing that convection has enough power to raise mountains
c. evidence that continental crust can sink into denser mantle material.
I'm listing below what I'd like to have for each model in order to consider the model as possibly having high plausibility. It may turn out that after requests are fulfilled, I find I need something else in addition.
Review Requests:
FOR ALL MODELS, CNPS REQUESTS:
a. explanation of what caused the fracturing seen in the deep boreholes in Russia & Germany
b. explanation of how sedimentary megasequences formed over millions of years without showing significant erosion between them
c. proof that any radiometric dating is reliable.
Expansion Tectonics: supposes that major Earth features are explained mainly by gradual Earth expansion.
1. Several people have shown that the continents could have fit together on a small Earth with little or no ocean basins.
James Maxlow, David Noel, Gene Ellis et al support expanding/growing Earth models.
_CNPS REQUESTS:
a. a more detailed map of small Earth showing:
a1. where the original continental boundaries fit together
a2. if rock & fossil types match near formerly adjoining boundaries
a3. if trails are left on the seafloors that support the fit
a4. where the continents may have morphed and if there's evidence of such morphing
b. means to distinguish between Earth expansion & Earth morphing (See #5 below).
2. __James Maxlow suggests: the solar wind and/or cosmic rays cause Earth expansion.
www.expansiontectonics.com
_CNPS REQUESTS:
c. an explanation of the solar wind / cosmic rays expansion mechanism and why it's probable
d. a diagram and a calculation of the mechanism.
3. __David Noel suggests: that expansion is due to neutronium in Earth's core that expands at the core surface. (Charles Cagle and Michael Mozina have had similar views.)
www.aoi.com.au/EP/
.An advantage of a neutronium core is that it would not require an outside source for expansion.
.A disadvantage is that it would not increase Earth's mass, so gravity at the surface would weaken instead of strengthen as it expands, whereas the former existence of megafauna suggests that Earth's gravity was effectively weaker in the past.
.Other possible explanations for past weaker gravity for megafauna are a more rapid Earth spin, a much thicker atmosphere & electromagnetic effects.
_CNPS REQUESTS:
c. evidence of neutronium & its expansion
d. an explanation of the neutronium expansion mechanism and why it's probable.
4. __Gene Ellis suggests: that Earth formed from dark matter, that mass & radius of elements increased gradually over time via ionization potential & that the ongoing reduction in Earth's spin rate is a measure of its increasing mass.
ionic-expanding-earth.Weebly.com
_CNPS REQUESTS:
c. evidence of dark matter & of matter expansion via ionization potential
d. an explanation of the dark matter to matter expansion mechanism and why it's probable
e. confirmation that no other means of Earth's spin rate reduction, besides mass increase, such as electromagnetic braking, is probable.
5. __Fred Juenemann theorized that Earth was formerly elongated at the poles (oval-shaped), which would produce the appearance of expansion as it changed to a spherical shape.
www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4932&start=30#p56045
.Advantages of this model are that Earth may have spun faster, countering gravity at the surface for megafauna, and that no neutronium, or input of solar wind or cosmic rays were needed to account for the expansion. Fred also supposed that Earth's formerly thicker atmosphere would have countered gravity.
Electric Universe: supposes that major Earth features are explained mainly by electrical forces.
iascc.org __ holoscience.com __ thunderbolts.info (& Surge Tectonics: ncgt.org __ forums.naturalphilosophy.org/showthread.php?tid=113 )
6. __Bruce Leybourne & __Robert Farrar (& Wal Thornhill) suppose that the Atlantic basin was formed by sustained megalightning, i.e. electric discharge, which also produced fossiliferous sedimentary strata on adjacent continents.
_CNPS REQUESTS:
a. calculations of the precise conditions needed to produce the needed size of arc blasts (or megalightning)
b. specifying which strata & fossils were affected & to what distances, shown on a map
c. an explanation of how sedimentaton occurred
d. a comparison with known lightning trenches & an explanation of why no smaller meandering trench is found on the Atlantic seafloor.
7. __Andy Hall, __Doug Ettinger & maybe Robert (?) suppose that the Colorado plateau and many mountain chains, especially with flat irons, were formed by arc blasts (or megalightning) from the Puerto Rico trench etc.
andrewdhall.wordpress.com/2016/06/05/arc-blast/ __ thedailyplasma.blog/2016/09/16/arc-blast-part-one/
_CNPS REQUESTS:
a. calculations of the precise conditions needed to produce the needed size of megalightning
b. specifying which types of mountains were affected & how
c. cross-sections &/or on-site data.
8. Earth Metamorphism: (__Doug Ettinger) supposes that major Earth features were caused by periodic cataclysmic encounters with a dwarf star system.
EttingerJournals.com
_CNPS REQUESTS:
a. specifying which features were caused by impacts & which by arc blasts (or megalightning)
b. calculations showing sizes & velocities of impactors
c. calculations showing sizes, distances & charges of bodies that produced arc blasts (or megalightning)
d. identification of the dwarf star system on a sky photo map
9. Electrostatic Universe: (__Charles Chandler) supposes that major Earth features were caused by Shock Dynamics & electric double layers within the Earth.
qdl.scs-inc.us/?top=6031
_CNPS REQUESTS:
a. links to relevant papers.
b. brief explanations.
10. Shock Dynamics: (__Mike Fischer) supposes that major Earth features were caused by a very large impactor breaking up the supercontinent.
NewGeology.us
_CNPS REQUESTS:
a. links to relevant papers.
b. brief explanations.
11. Mainstream: (__John Weirich & Doug) supposes that major Earth features were caused by mantle convection.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_tectonics
_CNPS REQUESTS:
a. evidence of mantle convection
b. calculations showing that convection has enough power to raise mountains
c. evidence that continental crust can sink into denser mantle material.