Post by Admin on May 28, 2018 11:27:17 GMT
CNPS WIKI
QUICK LINKS: scientists 2893; books 1450; scientific papers 6091; full papers 5; organizations 5; theory & models 14
TOPICS (& Authors): Aether 533; Cosmology 544; Electric Universe 197; Electrodynamics 262; Expansion Tectonics 216;
Gravity 1224; Particle Physics 68; Philosophy 92; New Energy 535; Relativity 2447; Structure 216; Tesla 201
TOPIC: .................. # of LINKS; SEARCH TERMS
_1. Singularity Big Bang: 22, Singularity + "Big Bang"
_2. Big Bang Expanding Universe: 119, "Expanding Universe"
_3. Redshift Distance Correlation: 62, Redshift Distance
_4. Redshift Velocity Correlation: Redshift Velocity
_5. Relativity: 396, Relativity
_6. Aether: 1014, Aether
_7. Black Hole Singularity: 131, "Black Hole"; 11, "Black Hole" + Singularity
_8. Worm Holes: 1, "Worm Hole"
_9. Quasar Active Galactic Nucleus: 57, Quasar; 14, "Active Galactic"
_10. Neutron Stars: 6, "Neutron Star"; 27, Pulsar
_11. Dark Matter: 1, "Dark Matter"
_12. Dark Energy: 179, "Dark Energy"
_13. Dirty Snowball Comets: 29, Comet
_14. Wave Theory of Light: 40, "Wave Theory"; 20, "Wave Model"
_15. Photons & Quanta: 472 "Photon"
_16. Bohr Model of Atoms: 131, "Bohr"; 14, "Bohr Model"; 6, "Planetary Model"
_17. Pushing Gravity: 26, "Le Sage" + gravity
_18. Dinosaurs Mya: 9, "Dinosaur"; 20, "dating"
___. Expansion Tectonics: 216, "Expansion Tectonics"
___. Sedimentary Rock: 3, Sedimentary Rock
___. EU: 1278 "electrodynamics"; 356 plasma; 352 "Electric Universe"; 211 electrodynamic; 172 electrostatic; 33 "plasma universe"; 22 "plasma cosmology"
___. Catastrophism: 39 mythology; 33 "catastrophism"; 25 Velikovsky; 17 ancient myth; 15 catastrophe
___. 369 Sun; 215 star; 191 planet; 29 comet; 22 asteroid; 10 "meteorite"; 5 "meteor"
CNPS Wiki has 352 links to Electric Universe papers and scientists.
"Electric Universe" wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=%22electric+universe%22&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
"Electric Universe" Venus wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=%22electric+universe%22+venus&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
"Electric Universe" Mars wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=%22electric+universe%22+mars&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
"Electric Universe" Saturn wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=%22electric+universe%22+saturn&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
"Electric Universe" Velikovsky wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=%22electric+universe%22+velikovsky&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
plasma sun wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=plasma+sun&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
electric sun wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=electric+sun+&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
plasma cosmology wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=plasma+cosmology&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
electric comet wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=electric+comet&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
---------------------
CNPS Outreach
EU COLLAB.
Reach out to leaders and members of other organizations you know that have interests in EU or other topics with strong interest at CNPS.
Tell them briefly about some of our programs and projects. Encourage them to look at the CNPS website.
Tell them that CNPS is interested in growing the "Critical Thinking" community.
You are contacting them to determine if they believe their members and their organization could BENEFIT by providing limited-time cross-organization access to both group's resources for their members at reduced cost. An example would be a one-year trial for a $15 cost to the member. The member would have to be an official member, in "good standing" with their existing organization. $5 of this fee would go to their organization; $10 would go to CNPS. The reverse of these values would also apply to CNPS members to affiliate with their organization. (essentially just administration costs.)
Ask them to contact you for more information.
If they believe that such a program would be a benefit, get their contact information. A member of the CNPS executive team will contact them with further details.
---------------------
BN Re Summary Paper
1. Be sole author or not? What's the difference? 2. For general audience does the paper need a lot more prose with descriptive information?
3. Make intro and Abstract more about ET, not the process that led to the project?
4. Questions for each model should not be listed, but should form a checklist to discuss each model & the answers should be in prose.
For example, your section I would start as follows:
1. Earth Models
This study selected 7 models for the dynamics of the earth surface which are currently under active discussion. These models are:
Plate Tectonics
Expansion Tectonics (lump all 3 together for this list)
Surge Tectonics
.
.
7. Shock Dynamics
(Reorder the model list so you can make a statement like the following.)
The first 5 models share the following common origin model.
The earth is estimated to be about 4.6 billion years ago (Giga years ago - (Ga)). It was formed when gravity pulled gas and dust particles together to form the planets. (The Nebular Gravitational Accretion Hypothesis). When the earth formed, it was in a totally molten form. The earth's crust solidified about 3.9 Ga.
Each of the models is briefly summarized here.
Plate Tectonics
Plate Tectonics is the current "mainstream" earth dynamics model. The term "mainstream" means the standard concept of earth dynamics that most of society will see in text books and consumer media. This model states that the surface of the earth is not one continuous land mass, but is composed of islands of earth, which generally form the continents, that are floating on the molten magma core of the earth. These plates do not stay fixed in their locations. Convection of the magma within the earth causes the plates to move. As magma rises, it forms new earth crust at ocean ridges. As the magma falls, in locations called subduction zones, it pulls surface crust down.
Weathering due to rain and wind cause surface rock to break into small boulders, sand and clay. Rain washes these into oceans and lakes where it forms sediments.
(This description will be very similar for each of the models. What makes the paper significant is how the differences between the theories is discussed.)
For Plate Tectonics, the earth was formed about 4.6 Ga; the crust formed about 3.9 Ga; major shallow seas were deposited about 200 Ma.
=I think it'd be better to say what each model has right, along with each one's unanswered questions
_About Formatting, here is a standard scientific paper outline as an example:
Short title in large letters at the top with a page wide underline
Long title in smaller letters below the underline
List of authors with a summary of academic affiliations
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
6. Suggestions for further research
References
=
QUICK LINKS: scientists 2893; books 1450; scientific papers 6091; full papers 5; organizations 5; theory & models 14
TOPICS (& Authors): Aether 533; Cosmology 544; Electric Universe 197; Electrodynamics 262; Expansion Tectonics 216;
Gravity 1224; Particle Physics 68; Philosophy 92; New Energy 535; Relativity 2447; Structure 216; Tesla 201
TOPIC: .................. # of LINKS; SEARCH TERMS
_1. Singularity Big Bang: 22, Singularity + "Big Bang"
_2. Big Bang Expanding Universe: 119, "Expanding Universe"
_3. Redshift Distance Correlation: 62, Redshift Distance
_4. Redshift Velocity Correlation: Redshift Velocity
_5. Relativity: 396, Relativity
_6. Aether: 1014, Aether
_7. Black Hole Singularity: 131, "Black Hole"; 11, "Black Hole" + Singularity
_8. Worm Holes: 1, "Worm Hole"
_9. Quasar Active Galactic Nucleus: 57, Quasar; 14, "Active Galactic"
_10. Neutron Stars: 6, "Neutron Star"; 27, Pulsar
_11. Dark Matter: 1, "Dark Matter"
_12. Dark Energy: 179, "Dark Energy"
_13. Dirty Snowball Comets: 29, Comet
_14. Wave Theory of Light: 40, "Wave Theory"; 20, "Wave Model"
_15. Photons & Quanta: 472 "Photon"
_16. Bohr Model of Atoms: 131, "Bohr"; 14, "Bohr Model"; 6, "Planetary Model"
_17. Pushing Gravity: 26, "Le Sage" + gravity
_18. Dinosaurs Mya: 9, "Dinosaur"; 20, "dating"
___. Expansion Tectonics: 216, "Expansion Tectonics"
___. Sedimentary Rock: 3, Sedimentary Rock
___. EU: 1278 "electrodynamics"; 356 plasma; 352 "Electric Universe"; 211 electrodynamic; 172 electrostatic; 33 "plasma universe"; 22 "plasma cosmology"
___. Catastrophism: 39 mythology; 33 "catastrophism"; 25 Velikovsky; 17 ancient myth; 15 catastrophe
___. 369 Sun; 215 star; 191 planet; 29 comet; 22 asteroid; 10 "meteorite"; 5 "meteor"
CNPS Wiki has 352 links to Electric Universe papers and scientists.
"Electric Universe" wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=%22electric+universe%22&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
"Electric Universe" Venus wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=%22electric+universe%22+venus&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
"Electric Universe" Mars wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=%22electric+universe%22+mars&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
"Electric Universe" Saturn wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=%22electric+universe%22+saturn&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
"Electric Universe" Velikovsky wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=%22electric+universe%22+velikovsky&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
plasma sun wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=plasma+sun&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
electric sun wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=electric+sun+&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
plasma cosmology wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=plasma+cosmology&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
electric comet wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?search=electric+comet&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
---------------------
CNPS Outreach
EU COLLAB.
Reach out to leaders and members of other organizations you know that have interests in EU or other topics with strong interest at CNPS.
Tell them briefly about some of our programs and projects. Encourage them to look at the CNPS website.
Tell them that CNPS is interested in growing the "Critical Thinking" community.
You are contacting them to determine if they believe their members and their organization could BENEFIT by providing limited-time cross-organization access to both group's resources for their members at reduced cost. An example would be a one-year trial for a $15 cost to the member. The member would have to be an official member, in "good standing" with their existing organization. $5 of this fee would go to their organization; $10 would go to CNPS. The reverse of these values would also apply to CNPS members to affiliate with their organization. (essentially just administration costs.)
Ask them to contact you for more information.
If they believe that such a program would be a benefit, get their contact information. A member of the CNPS executive team will contact them with further details.
---------------------
BN Re Summary Paper
1. Be sole author or not? What's the difference? 2. For general audience does the paper need a lot more prose with descriptive information?
3. Make intro and Abstract more about ET, not the process that led to the project?
4. Questions for each model should not be listed, but should form a checklist to discuss each model & the answers should be in prose.
For example, your section I would start as follows:
1. Earth Models
This study selected 7 models for the dynamics of the earth surface which are currently under active discussion. These models are:
Plate Tectonics
Expansion Tectonics (lump all 3 together for this list)
Surge Tectonics
.
.
7. Shock Dynamics
(Reorder the model list so you can make a statement like the following.)
The first 5 models share the following common origin model.
The earth is estimated to be about 4.6 billion years ago (Giga years ago - (Ga)). It was formed when gravity pulled gas and dust particles together to form the planets. (The Nebular Gravitational Accretion Hypothesis). When the earth formed, it was in a totally molten form. The earth's crust solidified about 3.9 Ga.
Each of the models is briefly summarized here.
Plate Tectonics
Plate Tectonics is the current "mainstream" earth dynamics model. The term "mainstream" means the standard concept of earth dynamics that most of society will see in text books and consumer media. This model states that the surface of the earth is not one continuous land mass, but is composed of islands of earth, which generally form the continents, that are floating on the molten magma core of the earth. These plates do not stay fixed in their locations. Convection of the magma within the earth causes the plates to move. As magma rises, it forms new earth crust at ocean ridges. As the magma falls, in locations called subduction zones, it pulls surface crust down.
Weathering due to rain and wind cause surface rock to break into small boulders, sand and clay. Rain washes these into oceans and lakes where it forms sediments.
(This description will be very similar for each of the models. What makes the paper significant is how the differences between the theories is discussed.)
For Plate Tectonics, the earth was formed about 4.6 Ga; the crust formed about 3.9 Ga; major shallow seas were deposited about 200 Ma.
=I think it'd be better to say what each model has right, along with each one's unanswered questions
_About Formatting, here is a standard scientific paper outline as an example:
Short title in large letters at the top with a page wide underline
Long title in smaller letters below the underline
List of authors with a summary of academic affiliations
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
6. Suggestions for further research
References
=